英语辩论赛常用词汇和表达法汇总

正方 pro side 反方 con side

正方一辩 the first debater of pro side 反方一辩 the second debater of con side 计时员 timekeeper 一辩：first debater 二辩：second debater 对方辩友，my fellow debaters 开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....

如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logic You are missing the point！（你没有说重点！你没有围绕中心！即，他在钻洞子，这个时候他很有可能会说漏。注意，要用are，不能说成You're，因为这样语气，士气就没有了。） You just don't understand what we talked about！（你根本就没有明白我们刚说了什么！即：误解了，曲解了）

You know what? You are straying from the main point！你知道吗？你已经跑题了！（也要注意，都用You are） 自由辩论的阶段，可以在他在说的时候，插进去，说“Wait！Wait！You just said……，did you？”（当然这句话要用在，你发现对方说的不正确时~~） You are generalizing what I asked！(你在以偏盖全！即：我要你回答这个，但对方你绕过去了！) Please ask my question！（请不要回避我的问题！请你回答！！） 征求他人观点或意见的用语 I would be glad to hear your opinion of….我很乐意听听你对。。。的看法 Are you of the same opinion as I ?你与我的看法一致吗？

I was wondering where you stood on the question of……我想知道你对。。。。问题怎么看 引入自己的新观点或看法 Another point is that…另一点是

Another way of looking at it is…….这个问题的另一个看法是 I forget to say/ tell you that…….我忘记要讲。。。。 就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 That’s all I want to say.我想说的就这些了。

Do you agree? I’m sure you agree 你赞同吗？我相信你是赞同的。 礼貌地反对对方观点 I’m not sure really. Do you think so? Well, it depends. I’m not so certain. I’m not so sure about that.

I’m inclined to disagree with that. No, I don’t think so really. 强烈反对对方观点 I disagree. I disgree with you entirely. I’m afraid I don’t agree. I;m afraid you are wrong there. I wouldn’t accept that for one mintue. You can’t really mean that. You can’t be serious.

A， shall be borne by the chairman of the debate 1， the debate began

2， announced the motion

3， introduce the participating team and its position 4， introduce team member

5， introduce rules， judges and staff 6， debate competition 7， the judges review

8， for audience questions， the judges score (simultaneous)

9， announced the result of the match The debate over 10

Second， the process of the debate 1， the theoretical stage defense:

(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides ZhuBian stated his own first main point. Must be completed within the specified time.

(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2， against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view，

(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three， against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis， provide arguments to support his own views. Phase 2， free debate by tetragonal speak first， then the opposition spokesman， sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)

3， summarize four contend for final statement by both parties， summarizes has side view， refute each other subjective point: (1) argue against four summation (2) square four summation

4. Audience member: the audience to questions of both players， players must give the answer patiently. Stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question. 5， the judges scoring stage

6， the judges review the process of both views and debate. 7， the announcement

Three， the rules of the debate

1， each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time， over time， in accordance with abstained processing， and lose from team total score 5 points.

2， free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams， the first to speak with a member of tetragonal， then one by opposition players， the two sides take turns， until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete， what time each other， each stick words between 60-800 words， can only ask a question at a time.)

Fourth， criteria

(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game. (2) criteria

1， point clear， argument is sufficient， citing appropriate， analyzed thoroughly. 2， grabbed the other views and error， precedents and precise， and to the point. 3， reflect agile， strong ability to deal with. 4， articulate， level clear， tight logic.

(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively， out of 100)

(1) the topic: can the logic， theory， from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle， argument is sufficient， reasoning is clear， whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.

(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument， argument is sufficient， whether logical reasoning process， the fact whether the reference is proper， true.

(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key， the problem simple. No questions or questions

within the time required， should be appropriate. The question of whether or not to answer each other， can you give a person the sense with justified. Don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.

(4) : whether to have team spirit， mutual support， debate cohesion is closely. Whether q&a form an organic whole， to a powerful blow to the other party.

(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. Personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.

(4) points: every topic， argument， dispute， cooperate， argue the wind project， do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules， are appropriate. Due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game， is decided by the jury， in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.

(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows: (6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form

(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. The game of \debater\tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain， formula is: the total integral/attend the session. (8) the outcome of judgment

1， the outcome of the game， on the basis of a few judges play group points， remove the a and a minimum points， calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement. 2， debater individual scoring points calculation method， calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis， has nothing to do with judging each outcome. Five， awards and incentives

1， every game are selected each a good debater each team， will decide after the game one of the best debater.