鐪嬭繃
涓嬭浇
姣欒�冮
APP
鍏嶈垂棰嗗彇鑰冭瘯骞茶揣璧勬枡锛岃繕鏈夎祫鏂欏晢鍩庣瓑浣犲叆椹?/p>
閭�璇风爜锛?/p>
8806
鍙幏寰楁洿澶氱鍒?/p>
鑰冭瘯浣跨敤姣欒�冮锛屼笉鐢ㄥ啀鎶ュ煿璁彮
瑙ｈ鑰冪爺鑻辫鐪熼闃呰闀块毦鍙?/p>
(2)
涓�杞溂宸茬粡鍒颁簡涔濇湀涓嬫棳锛岃�冪爺鐨勫悓瀛︿滑锛屼綘浠涔犺繘搴﹀埌鍝噷浜?/p>
?
瀛︽牎閲岀殑璇剧▼杩樻瘮杈?/p>
澶氭槸鍚?/p>
?
杩樺湪绾犵粨鍒板簳鎶ヨ�冨摢鎵�瀛︽牎瀵瑰悧
?
娌′簨鐨勶紝鍚屽浠紝
杩欐鏃堕棿浣犱滑鍙兘鏈夌偣蹇冪疮锛?/p>
浣?/p>
鏄竴瀹氳瀛︿細鍧氭寔
!
鑰冪爺灏辨槸涓�鍦哄叧浜?/p>
鍧氭寔
鐨勬垬鏂楋紝涓嶇鏆戝亣澶嶄範寰楀浣曪紝涔熶笉蹇呯鍗佹湀
浠藉皢鎬庝箞鎷╂牎锛?/p>
杩囧幓鐨勪簨宸茬粡鏃犳硶鏀瑰彉锛?/p>
灏嗘潵鐨勪簨璋佷篃璇翠笉瀹氾紝
鍙湁鍦ㄧ幇鍦ㄦ妸鎻″ソ鏃堕棿浣犳墠
鏈夊彲鑳芥垚鍔熴�?/p>
鍜变滑鍏堟潵鐪?/p>
2016
骞磋�冪爺鑻辫鐪熼闃呰
Text2
涓繖鍙ヨ瘽銆?/p>
While
polls
show
Britons
rate
the
countryside
alongside
the
royal
family,
Shakespeare
and
the
National
Health
Service
(NHS)
as
what make them proudest of their country, this has limited political support.
杩欏彞璇濓紝
涔嶄竴鐪嬫病浠�涔堢敓鍗曡瘝锛?/p>
浣嗘槸鐞嗚В璧锋潵寰堣垂鍔层�?/p>
鐞嗚В杩欏彞璇濈殑鍏抽敭鐐瑰湪浜?/p>
rate
杩欎釜
璇嶃�備箣鍓嶅悓瀛︿滑瀛︿範鐨勬椂鍊欙紝杩欎釜鍗曡瘝璇嶆�ф槸鍚嶈瘝锛屽惈涔夋槸
姣旂巼
銆備絾鍦ㄨ繖鍙ヨ瘽涔嬩腑锛?/p>
rate
寰堟槑鏄炬槸鍔ㄨ瘝锛?/p>
鍋氳皳璇紝
鍏跺惈涔夋槸
璁や负
銆?/p>
鐪嬫竻妤氳繖涓瘝涔嬪悗锛?/p>
鎴戜滑鍐嶆潵鐮旂┒璇ュ彞瀛愮殑缁撴瀯锛?/p>
鍓嶅崐鍙ユ槸鐢?/p>
while
寮曞鐨勮姝ョ姸璇粠鍙ワ紝涓诲彞鍏跺疄鍦ㄥ悗闈紝
this
has
limited
political
support
锛屾槸
涓昏皳瀹?/p>
缁撴瀯銆?/p>
璁╂鐘惰浠庡彞涔嬩腑锛屽姩璇?/p>
show
鐨勫悗闈㈡槸瀹捐浠庡彞銆?/p>
Britons rate the countryside alongside
the royal family, Shakespeare and the National Health Service (NHS) as what make them proudest
of
their
country
銆傝瀹捐浠庡彞鐨勫惈涔夋槸
鑻卞浗浜烘妸
涔℃潙
涓庣殗瀹ゃ�佽帋澹瘮浜氬拰鍥芥皯鍖荤枟鏈嶅姟
鍒跺害鍒椾负鍥藉鏈�璁╀粬浠嚜璞殑鍥涗釜鏂归潰
銆?/p>
閭ｄ箞鏁村彞璇濈殑鍚箟灏辨槸锛氬敖绠℃皯鎰忚皟鏌ユ樉绀猴紝鑻卞浗浜烘妸
涔℃潙
涓庣殗瀹ゃ�佽帋澹瘮浜氬拰鍥芥皯鍖?/p>
鐤楁湇鍔″埗搴﹀垪涓哄浗瀹舵渶璁╀粬浠嚜璞殑鍥涗釜鏂归潰锛屼絾鏄繖绉嶈鐐瑰緱鍒扮殑鏀挎不鏀寔鍗存瀬涓烘湁闄愩�?/p>
鍐嶆潵鐪嬩笅闈㈠嚑鍙ャ�?/p>
At
the
next
election
none
of
the
big
parties
seem
likely
to
endorse
this
sentiment. The Conservatives
鈥?/p>
planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over
conservation, even authorizing off
鈥?/p>
plan building where local people might object. The concept of
sustainable development has been defined as profitable.
杩欏嚑鍙ュ綋涓紝绗竴鍙ュ拰绗笁鍙ラ兘姣旇緝鐭紝鐞嗚В璧锋潵姣旇緝瀹规槗锛屼絾鏄腑闂寸殑绗簩鍙ユ瘮杈冮暱銆?/p>
绗竴鍙ョ殑鍚箟鏄細
鍦ㄤ笅娆￠�変妇涓紝
鍙兘娌℃湁涓�涓ぇ鍏氫細鏀寔杩欎釜瑙傜偣
銆?/p>
绗笁鍙ョ殑鍚箟鏄?/p>
鍙?/p>
鎸佺画鍙戝睍鐨勬蹇佃瀹氫负鐩堝埄
銆傜浜屽彞涓诲共鐨勭粨鏋勬槸
涓昏皳瀹?/p>
銆備富璇槸
The
Conservatives
鈥?/p>
planning reform
锛岃皳璇槸
gives
锛屽璇槸
rural development priority
锛?/p>
over conservation
鏄姸璇�?/p>
even authorizing off
鈥?/p>
plan building
鏄姩璇?/p>
ing
寮曞鐨勭姸璇紝
where
local people might object
鏄敤鏉ヤ慨楗?/p>
building
鐨勩�傞偅涔堢浜屽彞鐨勫惈涔夊氨寰堟槑鏄句簡锛氫繚瀹堝厷鐨?/p>
鏀归潻璁″垝鏄庣‘浜嗚浼樺厛淇濇姢涔℃潙鐨勫彂灞曪紝鍗充娇鎺堟潈浜嗗綋鍦颁汉鍙兘鍙嶅鐨?/p>
璁″垝澶?/p>
寤虹瓚銆?/p>
鏈�鍚庢潵鐪?/p>
Text 2
鐨勮繖鍑犲彞銆?/p>
Half a century of town and country planning has enable it to retain
an enviable rural coherence, while still permitting low-density urban living. There is no doubt of
the
alternative-the
corrupted
landscapes
of
southern
Portugal,
Spain
or
Ireland.
Avoiding
this
rather than promoting it should unite the left and right of the political spectrum.
杩欏嚑鍙ョ悊瑙ｈ捣鏉ュ苟涓嶅お闅撅紝澶у鍙互鑷鍒嗘瀽璇硶鍙婄粨鏋勩�傚缓璁悓瀛︿滑鑷鍒嗘瀽瀹岀粨鏋勪箣
鍚庡啀鐪嬪弬鑰冮噴涔夈�傞噴涔夊涓嬨�?/p>
鍗婁釜涓栫邯鐨勫煄涔¤鍒掍娇鑻卞浗淇濇寔浜嗕护浜虹尽鎱曠殑鐢板洯椋庯紝鍚屾椂涔熶繚鎸佷簡鍩庡競浜哄彛鐨勪綆瀵嗗害銆?/p>
姣棤鐤戦棶锛?/p>
钁¤悇鐗欏崡閮ㄣ�?/p>
瑗跨彮鐗欏拰鐖卞皵鍏拌鐮村潖鎺夌殑椋庢櫙涔熸槸鍙互鏀瑰彉鐨勩�?/p>
閬垮厤鑰屼笉鏄績杩?/p>
杩欎竴鐐瑰簲璇ュ洟缁撴斂娌诲厷娲句腑鐨勫乏娲惧拰鍙虫淳銆?/p>