杈瑰潯绋冲畾鎬у垎鏋愭姤鍛?/p>
鏂滐紙杈癸級鍧＄ǔ瀹氭�у垎鏋愭柟娉曠患杩?/p>
鎽樿鏂滃潯绋冲畾鎬у垎鏋?/p>
鏂规硶鐩墠涓昏鍒嗕负瀹氭�х被鏂规硶銆佸畾閲忕被鏂规硶鍜岄潪纭畾鎬ф柟
娉曘�?/p>
瀹氭�х被鏂规硶鍜屽畾閲忕被鏂规硶閮芥瘮杈冩垚鐔燂紝灏ゅ叾浠ュ畾閲忕被鏂?/p>
娉曪紙鍒氫綋鏋侀檺骞宠 娉曞拰鏈夐檺鍗曞厓娉曠瓑鏁板�艰绠楁柟娉曪級杩愮敤杈?/p>
澶氾紱鑰岄潪纭畾鎬ф柟娉曡櫧鐒舵柟娉曡緝澶氾紝浣嗙洰鍓嶄娇鐢ㄧ浉瀵硅緝灏戙�?/p>
鏈枃涓昏浠嬬粛涓夌被鍒嗘瀽鏂规硶涓殑涓�浜涘叿浣撴柟娉曞強鍏跺師
鐞嗭紝骞跺涓夌被鏂规硶鐨勭壒寰佸強浼樼己鐐硅繘琛岀畝鍗曡瘎浠枫�?/p>
鍏抽敭璇嶆枩鍧＄ǔ瀹氭�у垎鏋?/p>
,
瀹氭�х被鏂规硶
,
瀹氶噺绫绘柟娉?/p>
,
闈炵‘瀹?/p>
鎬ф柟娉?/p>
ABSTRACT
Nowadays,
the
methods
evaluating
slope
stability
are
mainly
divided
into
qualitative
methods,
quantitative methods and nondeterministic methods. Qualitative
methods
and
quantitative
methods
are
both
comparatively
mature,
and
especially
quantitative
methods
rigid
equilibrium
limit method and numerical computation methods such as finite
element method are widely employed; while although there are
many
kinds
of
nondeterministic
methods,
they
are
comparatively
less
employed.
The
paper
mainly
introduces
some specific methods and their theories of the three evaluating
methods,
and
short
comments
are
made
on
the
characteristics,
merits and demerits of the three evaluating methods. Key Words